← Preaching Lab

Father's Day · Ephesians 6:4 · Luke 15:11-32 · Psalm 103:13 · Joshua 24:15

Father's Day Sermon: A Father Who Does Not Provoke

Father's Day pulls a congregation in two directions at once — gratitude for fathers who did well, and grief or anger toward fathers who did not. What the day quietly demands of the preacher is a picture of fatherhood large enough to hold both: firm enough for Ephesians 6:4's warning, tender enough for the running father in Luke 15.

The text at a glance

  1. Four texts get called on for Father's Day, and each does a different job: Ephesians 6:4 addresses fathers directly, warning against provoking children to anger while raising them in the Lord's instruction.
  2. Luke 15:11-32 does not open on a father at all — it opens on a son demanding his inheritance early, and the father does not become the center of the story until the son is still a long way off.
  3. Psalm 103:13 borrows fatherly compassion as a simile for the Lord's own compassion, which means the verse is really describing God, using human fatherhood as the nearest available picture rather than the subject itself.
  4. Joshua 24:15 is a household's vow made in public at a covenant renewal, not a father's private parenting technique or a line meant to be read as personal advice.
  5. Put together, these four texts ask the pulpit to speak about fatherhood without turning the sermon into either a tribute to the fathers present or an indictment of the fathers who are not.

Three ways a sermon can go

Address the fathers directly (Ephesians 6:4)

Take the verse at its word and speak to fathers as fathers, naming the two things it warns against — provoking to anger and withholding instruction. This costs some comfort, since it requires saying something specific enough that a father could recognize himself in it, not a general call to be more present.

Preach the father in the parable (Luke 15:11-32)

Let the running father carry the sermon, with both sons — the one who left and the one who stayed and resents it — as two different ways of misreading him. This requires resisting the pull to stop at the younger son's return, since the text does not resolve the older son's anger and the sermon should not pretend it does.

Preach God's fatherhood first, human fathers second (Psalm 103:13)

Start from the Lord's compassion and let human fatherhood be the borrowed image rather than the subject, which protects anyone whose father was absent or harmful from having to supply the comparison themselves. This costs some of the expected content for the day, since it will not sound like a sermon about fathers unless the turn is made explicit.

Where sermons on this text commonly slip

Turning the sermon into a tribute

A sermon that only praises fathers and hands out compliments leaves Ephesians 6:4's warning unpreached, and leaves anyone who cannot honor their father with nowhere to stand. The text has an edge; the day's sentiment tends to file it off.

Stopping at the younger son

Luke 15 is often preached as if it ends with the party in full swing, when the passage continues through the older brother's refusal to go in. Cutting the parable short turns a story about two kinds of distance from the father into a simple return-and-celebrate story, which is easier to preach but not what the text says.

Making Joshua 24:15 a personal parenting slogan

'As for me and my house' gets preached as an individual father's resolution, but the verse is Joshua speaking to the assembled tribes at a covenant renewal. Importing private family-devotions content onto a public, corporate vow changes what the verse is actually doing.

Five questions to ask afterwards

  1. When you addressed fathers from Ephesians 6:4, did you name both halves of the verse — provoking to anger and bringing up in instruction — or only one?
  2. In the Luke 15 material, did the sermon reach the older brother's scene, or did the recording effectively end with the younger son's return?
  3. Did Psalm 103:13's father language stay pointed at God, or did the sermon drift into describing ideal human fathers with God mentioned only at the start and end?
  4. Can you find the minute in the recording where the sermon spoke to someone without a father worth thanking, rather than assuming every listener had one?
  5. Did the sermon settle for the category 'fathers' or 'families,' or can you point to a sentence addressed to a specific listener — a father of young children, an adult child of an absent father, someone who is not a father at all?

Keeping the application on the ground

A landed application for this material names one thing a father, or someone shaped by a father, could actually do this week — not the direction 'be a better father' or 'forgive your father,' which everyone already agrees with and no one can be checked on. The four texts supply concrete material for something more specific than that.

Get a report on your recording of this sermonWhat Preaching Lab is

Related passages