October 18, 2026 · 21th Sunday after Pentecost (Proper 24) · No sign-in needed
October 18 Sunday Sermon Passages — Proper 24: four ways to open this week
These four readings keep circling the same question: who really holds power, and what do we owe it. Exodus and Isaiah ask that of God's own presence and of a foreign king; Matthew asks it of a coin. Use this page to compare the four before you commit to one for Sunday.
Which passage will you preach this Sunday?
These are passages a sermon can take on this Sunday. The order is not a ranking — read the introductions, then tap the one that draws you and it opens below.
Passages follow the Revised Common Lectionary (RCL); “Occasion” passages are options we add for the season. If your church follows its own calendar or preaches through a book, carry on as you were.
Gospel
Matthew 22:15-22 Whose Image Is This?
If you choose this passage, the sermon becomes a sermon about what belongs to Caesar and what belongs to God, and how a believer lives under both claims at once.
The passage at a glance
- Religious and political opponents team up to trap Jesus with a question about paying taxes to Caesar.
- Jesus asks for a coin, points to the emperor's image stamped on it, and asks whose image it bears.
- He tells them to give Caesar what bears Caesar's image and give God what bears God's, and his questioners leave amazed and silent.
Ways the sermon can go
The coin and the image
Jesus's answer hinges on whose image is stamped on the coin, so a sermon can ask what in a person's life carries God's image instead, though that can slide into a slogan if pushed too hard.
The trap itself
The Pharisees and Herodians are unlikely allies, united only to corner Jesus; exploring that alliance says something about hostility uniting strange partners, at the cost of less time on the tax question itself.
Church and state across history
This verse has anchored centuries of debate about civil obedience and resistance; naming that history keeps the sermon honest but costs some simplicity.
Where sermons commonly slip
Turning it into a political slogan
Reducing render unto Caesar to a modern partisan line misses that Jesus leaves the boundary between the two claims undefined.
Skipping the trap
Preaching only the punchline and skipping why the question was dangerous drains the story of its tension.
Three things to check on the recording afterwards
- Did the sermon name a specific present-day 'Caesar' — a government, a tax, an authority — or stay entirely in the first century?
- How many times did the sermon use a phrase like 'separation of church and state,' and did it ever define what that meant here?
- Did the sermon explain why the Pharisees and Herodians were an unlikely pair, or leave that detail out?
One application for this week
Before Sunday, look at one bill or pay stub and say out loud one thing in your life that belongs to Caesar and one thing that belongs to God.
Epistle
1 Thessalonians 1:1-10 A Church Everyone Was Talking About
If you choose this passage, the sermon becomes a sermon about what a congregation's reputation reveals about its faith, and what it costs to become an example others point to.
The passage at a glance
- Paul opens by thanking God for the Thessalonians' faith, love, and hope, naming all three together.
- He recalls how the gospel reached them with power and conviction, and how they imitated Paul and the Lord even while suffering.
- Their turn from idols to serve the living God has become known everywhere, and now they wait for Jesus to come from heaven.
Ways the sermon can go
Faith, love, hope as a frame
Paul's triad — work of faith, labor of love, steadfastness of hope — gives a sermon a natural three-part shape, though forcing all three in can leave each one thin.
A congregation's public reputation
Paul says their turning from idols became known everywhere; a sermon can ask what the neighborhood actually says about this church now, which risks sounding like a performance review.
Imitation under pressure
The Thessalonians received the word in real affliction yet imitated Paul and the Lord with joy; naming that cost keeps the sermon honest but is harder to preach than plain encouragement.
Where sermons commonly slip
Turning thanksgiving into flattery
Preaching this as a pat on the back for the present congregation skips that Paul is praising a specific, costly turn from idols, not general niceness.
Skipping the affliction
Leaving out verse 6's much affliction turns a hard-won faith into an easy success story.
Three things to check on the recording afterwards
- Did the sermon name faith, love, and hope as three distinct things, or blend them into one general word like faithfulness?
- Did the sermon mention the Thessalonians' affliction in verse 6, and how many times?
- Did the sermon ask what outsiders currently say about this congregation, or only describe what Paul said about Thessalonica?
One application for this week
Before Sunday, ask one person outside your church what they think your congregation is known for, and write down the answer without arguing with it.
Recent research on this passage
Michael Glowasky (2023). Ethos, Opposition, and Identification: Paul's Constitutive Rhetoric in 1 Thessalonians 1–3. The Catholic Biblical quarterly. Read the article
According to the abstract, Paul's warm tone in chapters 1 to 3 is not just gratitude but a rhetorical move that assigns the Thessalonians an identity he wants them to live into, building solidarity between himself and his readers under shared opposition.
Where in this sermon am I just describing the congregation's character, and where am I actually trying to shape it?
S. Joubert (2024). “It all starts with urgency…” Engaging with the local ekklesia of Thessalonica as a window and mirror en route to sustained missionary impact. Acta Theologica. Read the article
This article reads 1 Thessalonians 1 alongside Acts 17 as a window into Paul's urgent church planting in Thessalonica, arguing the congregation's steadfastness and openness to different social groups made them a visible example across the region.
Does the sermon treat the Thessalonians' example as something to admire from a distance, or as a pattern this congregation could actually live out with the people in our town?
Old Testament
Exodus 33:12-23 Can I See Your Glory?
If you choose this passage, the sermon becomes a sermon about asking God for more than a plan — for his actual presence and glory — and about what it means that even Moses only sees God's back.
The passage at a glance
- Moses presses God to promise that God's own presence, not just an angel, will go with the people, and God agrees and grants rest.
- Moses then asks to see God's glory, and God agrees to let his goodness pass by while hiding Moses in the cleft of a rock.
- God says no one can see his face and live, so Moses will see only God's back after God has already passed.
Ways the sermon can go
Presence versus a plan
Moses refuses to move forward on logistics alone and insists on God's own presence; a sermon can press a congregation on whether they want God's help or God himself, though that can tip into guilt if pushed too far.
Seeing God's back
The strange image of seeing only God's back after he has passed invites a sermon on partial, after-the-fact knowledge of God; it is hard to preach without over-explaining the mystery into trivia.
Favor in your sight
Moses repeats the phrase found favor in your sight, tying intimacy with God to his role leading the people; this fits a sermon on calling but can drift away from the glory request itself.
Where sermons commonly slip
Turning hiddenness into a riddle
Preachers sometimes try to explain exactly what seeing God's back meant physically, which turns mystery into trivia.
Losing the first half
Jumping straight to the glory request skips Moses's earlier insistence on God's presence going with the people, which is the hinge of the whole passage.
Three things to check on the recording afterwards
- Did the sermon address both halves of the passage — Moses's request for presence and his request for glory — or only one?
- How many times did the sermon say 'seeing God's face' versus 'seeing God's back,' and did it keep the distinction clear?
- Did the sermon name one concrete present-day situation where someone wants God's presence and not just God's help?
One application for this week
Before Sunday, write down one situation this week where you have been asking God for a plan when what you actually want is God himself, and bring that sentence to church.
Recent research on this passage
Francis Landy (2023). The Face of God: Dialogue and Distance in Exodus 33,12-34,8. Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament. Read the article
According to the abstract, the dialogue in Exodus 33 turns on different senses of the word face, holding together the paradox that God speaks to Moses face to face while God's face cannot be seen, and the article reads this as the text resisting easy resolution rather than offering one.
Am I letting the passage's two senses of face stay in tension, or am I collapsing them into one plain meaning for a cleaner sermon point?
Sergio Festa (2023). Seeing God? a brief comparison between mt and lxx on exodus 24:10-12. Kerygma. Read the article
This article compares how the Hebrew text and the Greek Septuagint handle the apparent contradiction between Exodus 24, where elders seem to see God, and Exodus 33:20, where seeing God's face means death, arguing the Greek translators softened rather than solved the tension.
If ancient translators felt the need to soften this contradiction, should the sermon smooth it over too, or let the congregation feel it?
Old Testament · alternate
Isaiah 45:1-7 God's Anointed Pagan King
If you choose this passage, the sermon becomes a sermon about God working through a ruler who does not know him, and about where God's power can show up outside the community of faith.
The passage at a glance
- God speaks directly to Cyrus, a foreign king, calling him anointed and promising to go ahead of him and open closed doors.
- God explains this is so that Cyrus will come to know the Lord, even though Cyrus does not yet know him.
- God then declares himself the one who forms both light and darkness, both well-being and calamity, so that people will know there is no other.
Ways the sermon can go
An outsider called by name
God names and commissions Cyrus before Cyrus has any faith, which opens a sermon on God using people outside the community of faith; the risk is tempting a preacher to name a modern political figure the same way.
Light, darkness, well-being, calamity
Verse 7's sweeping claim that God forms both light and darkness pushes a sermon toward the harder end of providence and suffering, a conversation some congregations are ready for and others are not.
So that you may know
The whole oracle aims at recognition, both Cyrus's and Israel's, of who the Lord is; building a sermon on this centers God's self-revelation rather than Cyrus's achievements, though it can feel abstract without a human story attached.
Where sermons commonly slip
Naming a modern Cyrus
Applying this text directly to a current ruler or election turns an ancient, specific oracle into a partisan claim the text does not make.
Softening verse 7
Preachers often quote I form light and create darkness but skip calamity, which blunts the verse's hard claim about God and suffering.
Three things to check on the recording afterwards
- Did the sermon name a modern political figure as a Cyrus-type, and if so, how carefully did it qualify that comparison?
- Did the sermon include verse 7's language about calamity, or stop at light and well-being?
- How many times did the sermon return to the phrase 'so that you may know' versus focusing on Cyrus's military success?
One application for this week
Before Sunday, name one person or institution outside the church that you suspect God is using for good, even though they would not describe it that way, and pray for them by name.
From recent (2023 onward) scholarly articles we chose only those likely to help a preacher read this passage. Citations come from OpenAlex and Crossref and each DOI was checked; summaries paraphrase the abstract alone. A paraphrased abstract cannot stand in for the argument. Read the article itself before you use it in a sermon. We did not check journal rank or the rigor of peer review — articles were chosen only for relevance to the passage.
Get a report on your recording of this sermonWhat is Preaching Lab?